Si je n'avais pas lu Edward Saïd, je serais orientaliste - لو ما قرأت كتاب إدوارد سعيد لكنت مستشرقة
Showing posts with label Journalisme et Médias / Journalism and media / الصحفي والإعلامي. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Journalisme et Médias / Journalism and media / الصحفي والإعلامي. Show all posts

Thursday, 15 August 2013

Books

Lost In Transmission - by Jonathan Harley

     Most interesting book on an australian foreign correspondent experience in India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. He doesn't get the religious side exaclty right (or rather, he doesn't delve too deeply into it, contenting himself with sometimes unadequate generalities), but the rest is very good, informative but above all, it makes you discover the experience of a journalist who tries to do things the right way in impossible circumstances. It's especially interesting on the personnal level : no one is a hero, and the ones who are die very quickly and those who only appear to be are the worst of the lot.
     Also a good book to be read when you start forgetting, as a sheltered westerner (sheltered from wars and such), what the rest of the world looks like. As he rightly says, we are not the norm, we're just lucky. The last pages on the death of his friends, on this subject, are moving and disturbing.
     And once again, the experience of someone who is "hooked up" by Afghanistan. This terrible and beautiful country seem to have this effect on so many people who ever managed to go there, capturing their minds for ever.

City of Veils - by Zoë Ferraris

      Good thriller, good crime story set in Saudi Arabia. This is the reason, as always, that made me buy the book, since anything on this country interests me, but in the end, the book in itself is really good, as any good thriller I read before. 
      It's the first book from her that I read, and I'm quite happy to have ordered the other two, that seems to take up the same characters in the same place (mainly Jeddah).
      The author obviously knows stuff about the place and the country, even though you might detect, through the characters (what they say of the islamic veil, etc), that the author knows very well the religion as practised in Saudi Arabia in hard-line milieus, but not really, if at all, how it is percieved and practised elsewhere. As if she knew islam only through the lense of hard-core Wahhabism, and so sometimes I would have wished so feel the texture and deepness of the rest of the islamic world, if only the neighbouring countries, and its past ... Since wahhabism is only a recent phenomenon there.
        So the plot is good, the writing is ok, but if you want to learn anything on the religion or the culture, it's not really the book to buy. It still relies too much on the usual clichés, and it doesn't have the deepness you could expect from someone who researched the subject. Though I don't know anything about the author, I would say it's the sort of book written by someone who lived there for a short time but whose experience didn't end well.
       Well, you can't blame an author for giving the western reader what life is like sometimes there and giving into the cliché to grip a usually ignorant western audience, but even in this country there are other forms of living and religious practise and understanding that have yet to be described (after all, like every Gulf country, Saudi Arabia has a lot of migrants from the arab and non-arab world). But then, I haven't read the other books, maybe it gets more "real" in the others ... !

Impossible Man - by Michael Muhammad Knight

      Most interesting autobiography. I don't want to comment much on it as I haven't read what seems to be the follow-up "journey to the end of islam", but I would say that I enjoyed his novels more that his autobiography, thus far. 
     It explains how he got to know so much about islam, but also why he is locked, always, in a patriarchal vision of everything, despite islamic feminism or any other phenomenon producing other discourse. I would have thought that with everything he had studied, he would have at least seen the huge roles of women both in history and nowadays in the middle east, but he seems to see islam only through a patriarchal lense, to mix up the cultures where it is practised with the religion that is practised (well, most of people do, but still, it's not an excuse). Maybe because he was confronted since the start to a near "hardcore" version of the religion. (We can understand this it to an extent ... These are times where, in any country and any culture, you only hear about the hardcore part of politics and ideologies, the "quiet majority" keeps to itself, hidden).
       Anyway, more than the religion, it's a story of a quest for absolutism, what any and every teenager is after, a quest that fails since life doesn't give much into absolutism of any sort ... He was looking for perfection and found a religion practised by most imperfect humans, like any religion or anything else. He expected religion to stand the test of science, and there too many people, in my opinion, fail to get that science has nothing to do with religion. One explains the rational part of the human being, the other tackles the irrationnal one. And the danger begins when you want to wipe off one of these two ...
      Anyway, I've been a bit carried away. Back to the book : the real hero is his mother, and the book's key sentence is something his insane father told him "Woman is the  nigger of the world". (Something that is only true if you keep seeing the world, like the author, as a classic-style patriarchy. Because my experience of so-called patriarchal societies shows something much more complex ...)


Monday, 21 January 2013

How to Avoid Being Killed In a War Zone


       «How To Avoid Being Killed In a War Zone : the essential survival guide for dangerous places» by Rosie Garthwaite.

The title in itself made me buy the book as soon as I saw it (or rather, as soon as I got the money). And I just recieved it, and took five minutes in my crazy schedule to go through it and I loved it at first glance : it is precisely what the title suggest. Not a novel, not a collection of events, just a heap of info and counsel to deal with about every subject and incidents one might encounter in the everyday life of someone who happen to live in a war zone (not only journalists, even if the book seem to be directed primarily at them).
This has been written by a war reporter working for Al Jazeera (the english version I suppose), and she interviewed a great many others to complete the book as best as possible ... which seem pretty true at this first glance. I can’t wait the end of exams to read it. 
It is the crazy book of the month, the book that make me remember one of my dreams, to become a war reporter. Traveling to Israel-Palestine made me realize that it could be a great job for me. 
I discovered there that something almost inocuous and traditional in my home country that is peaceful demonstrations, could mean death elsewhere, even if you didn’t break any laws whatsoever. During this afternoon when the group made of «internationals» (including me), israelis and palestinians got shot at and chased by the israeli army, and that « we were lucky because two of us got only midly injured that day and no-one was killed», I never felt so much that this was where I was supposed to be, with the desire to tell afterwards what I saw to anyone who cared. Or didn’t, for that matter. 
      I wasn’t even scared, and that got me thinking for a long time about my sanity : simple situations in life can stress the hell out of me, like taking the bus or buying a bread at the bakery, but weird things and out-of-the-usual situations (for a low-middle class westerner) make me feel almost relaxed, and I can deal with them with a clear mind.
Anyway, I’m curious about reading this book, the reading of which sounds like fun in itself ... I hope to review it very soon, meanwhile, there’s this article.


"كيف تتجانب أن تُقتل في منطقة حربية"
كتاب من صحفية انكليزية عملت لقناة الجزيرة (بالانكليزية على ما أعتقد) والعنوان جعلني أشتريه مباشرة ... واحد من أحلامي أن أصبح صحفية في مناطق حربية منذ رحت الى فلسطين شفت الواقع هناك. ويظهر أن الكتاب يعالج أي موضوع الحياة يمكنك أن تفكر به حتى المواضيع لن تفكر فيها قبل أن تعيشها في حياة يومية وسط الحرب. فأنتظر نهاية دراساتي بعد أشهر حتى أقرأ ذلك لكتاب وأقدم رأيّ فيه ...

Thursday, 6 September 2012

On prend (presque) les mêmes et on recommence ...


     En Syrie, «les armes chimiques sont sous surveillance» informe le Figaro (22 juillet 2012); «des forces spéciales américaines ont été déployées pour prévenir leur dispersion». Et un diplomate en poste en Jordanie avertit : «C'est la menace des armes chimiques qui peut déclencher une intervention américaine ciblée.» Nous voilà donc replongés avec Damas, à quelques nuances près, dans le scénario écrit pour Bagdad dis ans plus tôt. M. Bachar Al-Assad lâchera-t-il ses armes de destruction massive sur son opposition ? L'accusation est pourtant déjà vieille de plusieurs mois : «Des tueurs d'Assad [ont] lancé dans la région d'Al-Rastan, non loin de la ville rebelle de Homs, des opérations aériennes avec utilisation de gaz toxiques», rapportait dès septembre 2011 le site de Bernard-Henri Lévy.

    «[Nous avons] entendu cette affirmation de dizaines d'interlocuteurs dans la province de Hama, écrivait l'Agence France-Presse (AFP), avec une prudence exceptionnelle, le 27 juillet 2012. Mais, en dépit d'une semaine de recherches, aucun chef rebelle, chef de tribu, médecin, simple combattant ou civil n'a pu produire de preuvre irréfutable.» La guerre en Syrie, conclut la dépêche, «est aussi celle de l'information et de la désinformation».

Source : Syrie, champs de bataille médiatique, article de Marc de Miramon et Antonin Amado, dans Le monde diplomatique, septembre 2012.

Thursday, 26 January 2012

Dangereux métier que j'aimerais tant faire pourtant ...



(mise à jour) ( là, al Jazeera, 31 janvier 2012, 10h14 soir, direct à l'Onu : l'envoyé syrien ose affirmer que Gilles Jacquier s'est fait tué par les opposants ... Peur de rien, même pas du ridicule ).


(article original)
Thierry Thuillier, directeur des rédactions de France Télévisions, nous explique pourquoi le groupe audiovisuel a porté plainte après la mort du grand reporter de France 2, Gilles Jacquier, tué à Homs mercredi, lors d'un reportage.
FTVi : Pour vous, il semble que de nombreuses questions se posent autour de la mort de Gilles Jacquier…
Thierry Thuillier : Absolument. D’abord, la description même des images nous apprend que notre caméraman Christophe Kenck a été touché par six éclats alors qu’il se rendait vers l’immeuble où Gilles a trouvé la mort. A ce moment précis, on en est à la troisième salve de tirs. Et c’est lorsque Gilles Jacquier a voulu sortir de l’immeuble où il avait trouvé refuge qu’il a été frappé mortellement par une quatrième salve.
Pour nous, ce scénario pose de multiples questions quant à l’origine des tirs, quant à la cible visée. Regardez, les journalistes faisaient partie d’un convoi sous escorte, très sévèrement encadré. Quand les tirs ont commencé, les militaires syriens ont reculé, laissant seuls et exposés les journalistes. Pourquoi ? Je n’ai pas de réponse, la rédaction, France Télévisions, les familles veulent cette réponse
La Syrie a déclaré mettre en place une commission d’enquête, quelles considérations lui donnez-vous ?
Pour l’heure, à nos yeux, cette commission d’enquête n’a aucune existence. Lorsque je suis allé sur place, je n’ai rencontré aucune autorité. Le président Rémy Pflimlin n’a reçu aucun avis, aucune saisie de la part de Damas. Et c’est précisément pour cela que nous avons porté plainte de notre côté, de façon à trouver notre place dans le processus qui doit conduire à la vérité. Car il y a bel et bien des témoins, des journalistes par exemple, qui ont vu des choses. Et la famille, de même que les rédactions de France Télévisions, ne seront pas apaisées tant qu’elles ignoreront ce qui s’est passé. Je le répète : pour l’heure les réponses du gouvernement syrien ne sont pas satisfaisantes.
Vous semblez mettre en question la responsabilité des autorités syriennes dans ce qui s’est passé…
Pour l’instant, je pose des questions. Autre exemple : les tirs étaient précis. D’habitude, quand on tire au mortier, on procède à un quadrillage. Là, les témoins affirment qu’il ne s’agissait pas d’un tir à la va-vite, mais justement de quelque chose d’ajusté. Autre question : pourquoi notre équipe, qui ne voulait pas aller à Homs, s’y est-elle rendue ? Ce n’était pas sa mission, elle ne devait pas quitter Damas, son reportage était politique, pas sur le conflit actuel. Gilles Jacquier et Christophe Kenck avaient refusé de se rendre à Homs. Certes, les autres journalistes avaient accepté, mais à eux, on leur a dit : "Si vous refusez encore, vous repartez dans l’instant." Certes, actuellement la situation en Syrie est très dégradée, confuse, on ne sait pas qui fait quoi, mais avec l’aide des autorités françaises, nous ferons tout pour établir la vérité des faits.



France Television's editorial staff manager Thierry Thuillier explains why France Television Group is filing a complaint after the death of the channel France 2's reporter Gilles Jacquier, killed in Homs on the 11th january 2012.

FTVi : In your opinion, there is several questions that arise around Gilles Jacquier's death ...

Tierry Thuillier : absolutely. First, the pictures show that our cameraman Christophe Kenck was hit by 6 shards while he was headed towards the building where Gilles died. This precise moment corresponds to the third shooting round. And it is when Gilles Jacquier wanted to step out of the building where he had taken cover that he was shot dead by a fourth firing.
For us this scenario raises many question as to the origin of the shootings and their aim. Look, the journalists where part of a convoy under strict military escort. When shooting began, the syrians soldiers stepped back, leaving the journalists exposed. Why ? I don't have any answer, the editorial staff, France Television and the families want an answer to that.

FTVi : Syria declared the constitution of an investigation commitee, what do you think of this ?

T.T. : at this moment, for us, this investigation has no existence whatsoever. When I visited Syria, I didn't meet any officials. France Television's CEO didn't receive any note or information from Damascus. And this is exaclty why on our part we're filing a complaint, so as to be involved in the process of discovering the truth. Indeed there are witnesses, journalists for exampe, hwo have seen things. And families and France Television won't be at rest as long as they ignore what happened. I say it again : as of now, the syrian governement's answers are not satisfying.

FTVi : you seem to question the syrian authorities' involvement in what happened ...

T.T. : right now, I'm asking questions. Another example : the shootings were precise. Usually, when we use mortar, we do it covering a field. There, witnesses confirm that is was not random firings, but something like adjusted shootings. Another question : why our journalists, who did not want to go to Homs, were there ? It was not their missions, they weren't supposed to leave Damascus, their work was about politics, not the current conflict. Gilles Jacquier and Christophe Kenck had refused to go to Homs. Of course, other journalists had accepted, but just because they were told "if you refuse again, you leave the country immediately". Of course, the current situation in the country is really bad, unclear, we don't know who do what, but with the french authorities' help, we'll do everything to shed light on the matter and establish the truth of events.





يشرح مدير مكتب النشر لفرانس تيليفيزيون (France Televisions) تييري تويليي (Thierry Thuillier) لماذا تقدم مجموعة الاعلم فرانس تيليفيزيون شكوى بعد موت الصحافي الفرنسي جيل جاكيي (gilles jacquier) في مدينة حمص في ١١ من كانون الاول/جناير ٢٠١٢ خلال عمله

فرانس تيليفيزيون : بنسبة لك تفكر ان يوجد كثير من الاسئلة حول قتل جيل جاكيي ... 

تييري تويليي : فعلا. اولا وصف الصور يتضح ان مصورنا كريستوف كينك كان مصيب بست قطعة من سلاح وهو يتجه الى البناية حيث قُتل جيل جاكيي. في هذا اللحظة كان اطلاق النار الثالث. وفيما بعد لما اراد جيل جاكيي الخروج من البناية حيث كان مختبئا فيه اُصيب بارشق الرصاص الرابع.    
بنسبة لنا يطرح هذا السيناريو كثير من الاسئلة عن من كان يطلق النار ولأي هدف. انتبه، كان الصحفيون تحت حراسة شديدة وفي بداية اطلاق النار تراجع الجنود السوريون وتُرك الصحفيون متعرضين للرصاصات. لماذا؟ ما عندي جواب ونحن في مكتب النشر والعائلات نريد جوابا.

ف ت : اعلنت سورية وضع لجنة تحقيق، ما رؤيتك بها ؟

ت ت : حالا في رؤيتنا لا وجود لهذا الجنة. لما زرت سورية لا التقيت احدا من الحكومة. مديرنا ريمي فليمين ما وجد اي اشارة من قبل دمشق. وهذا السبب بالضبط لتقدمنا شكوى من اجل ان نكون جزء من عملية بحث الحق. يوجد شواهد، صحفيون مثلا، رأوا ما حدث. وما دام لا نعرف بالتفاصيل ما حدث لن نستريح. من جديد اقول : ليست اجابات الحكومة السورية مرضية.

ف ت : يظهر ان تتسائل عن مسؤلية النظام السوري في ما حدث
 ... 
ت ت : الان اسأل اسئلة فقط. ملاحظة اخرى : كانت الرصاصت متجهة بشكل دقيق. عادة مع استعمال هذا النوع من السلاح لا يوجد هدف محدد سابقا. ولكن هنا اكدوا الشواهد انه كان النار مطلقا لا بشكل عشوائي بل بشكل محدد. سؤال اخر : لماذا كان صحفيونا هناك وكنا نعرف انهم ما ارادوا الذهاب الى حمص ؟ ما كانت حمص هدفهم كانوا يعمل عن دمشق عن موضوع سياسي وليس عن المعركات الحالية. رفضا جيل جاكيي وكريستوف كينك الذهاب الى حمص. بصراحة قبلوا الصحفيون الاخرون الذهاب الى هناك ولكن لسبب واحد وهو ان قيل لهم "ان ترفض من جديد فتغادرون البلد فورا". طبعا الان الوضع السوري سيئ جدا ومشبه ولا نعرف من يفعل ماذا ولكن مع عون الحكومة الفرنسية سنبذل مجهودنا من الجل تحقيق ما حدث