"Le voyageur sans orient" de Salam al-Kindy

(FRA)

« Le voyageur sans orient : Poésie et philosophie des Arabes de l’ère préislamique» de Salam al-Kindy

     Voilà un très beau livre, plein de réflexions qui donnent à réfléchir et à revoir la culture arabo-musulmanne classique d’un oeil neuf. L’auteur maîtrise tellement son sujet, la pensée philosophique occidentale et la littérature des deux mondes arabe et européen qu’on se sent un peu bête parfois, et quelques passages son quelque peu difficile, mais si on prend le temps de le lire, et de le relire, c’est fascinant.

     Il nous explique l’essence de la poésie pré-islamique, pourquoi tant de spécialistes l’ont mal comprise, et ce en quoi elle diffère de la poésie post-coranique, même si de forme les similitudes sont grandes. Et de là, la différence radicale entre la vision du monde jâhilite (pré-islamique) et la vision du monde après l’apparition de l’islam :

«On présente parfois la Jâhiliyya et sa poésie comme ayant ‘‘préparé»» l’ère coranique ; il serait plus exact d’écrire que le Coran a bâti une réponse terme à terme à la vision du monde de la Jâhiliyya et à son élaboration conceptuelle»

p.161

     Et je dirais même qu’il est peut-être essentiel, à qui «l’esprit» de l’islam lui échappe, de comprendre d’abord l’esprit et la vision du monde de la Jâhiliyya. La réponse monothéiste apparue ensuite prend tout son sens. Dans le monde jâhilite ultra-pessimiste, étrangement  très moderne pour nous occidentaux du 21ème siècle, vient une réponse optimiste avec la promesse de l’au-delà, et l’affirmation d’une existence divine qui donne un sens là où les poètes erraient «sans orient», subissant les pertes du temps, sans retour possible aux joies passées ...

     Il ne faut pas y voir une hiérarchisation, façon «quelle vision du monde est la meilleure ?», mais simplement ce va et vient entre les deux opposés, et comme les concepts de l’un sont repris par l’autre (voir le dernier chapitre qui parle du soufisme) pour aller encore plus loin ... et qui forme finalement la base de la culture arabo-musulmanne.

Bref, même si la poésie n’est pas notre tasse de thé, ce livre vaut vraiment le coup d’être lu (et relu).

(ENG)

«The traveller without orient, poetry and philosophy of the pre-islamic Arabs» by Salam al-Kindy

         Excellent book, in french, but I highly doubt it's been translated into english ... A shame really.

      It is essential in my opinion for who wants to understand the spirit of arabo-islamic cutlure, and in what world the islamic religion appeared. It unearth this often over-looked and almost always badly apprehended poetry that is the «jâhiliyya» poetry (pre-islamic), and the world view it shows. A world view that is strangely very modern and very «pessimistic», to which comes the Quran, bringing an «optimistic» view with the afterlife and the affirmation of the existence of God. Not that one is better than the other, but you suddenly understand what this is all about, and on what opposites is based the whole arabo-islamic culture. And how this post-quranic culture took and used some pre-islamic concepts and made them into something both similar and different, on another level.

       The author master both litteratures and philosophies, western and arabic, so the book sweeps through philosophy and poetry, and also mystical concepts, and all becomes clear and coherent, which is very rare, when the subject is both so precise and obscure (pre-islamic poetry) and large (world views).

    Anyway, despite some difficult paragraphs (especially for those who are not used to philosophical prose), this is worth reading, and re-reading.

"المسافر بدون اتجاه : شعر وفلسلفة عرب الجاهلية" 

لسلام الكندي  ـ لا أعرف إذا ترجمتي صحيحة ...الكلمة "اتجاه" بالفرنسية هنا هي نفس الكلمة من "شرق"

 كتاب مكتوب بالفرنسية على يد مثقف عربي من سلطانة عمان, عن الشعر الجاهلية والرؤية وراءها, رؤية العرب أناذاك عن العالم والحياة وهذا الكتاب كان مهم جدًا بالنسبة اليّ ففهمت الكثير وفي أي عالم ظهر الاسلام وما هو من أجوبة في عالم رؤيته متشائمة بالمعنى الفلسفي فالقرآن يحمل رؤية متفائلة ... صعب جدًا أن تختصر مثل هذا الكتاب الذي  يستوعب الشعر وفلسلفة وحتى التصوّف  ... ولكنه مهم جدا جدا بالنسبة لأي شخص مثلي الذي\التي يريد أن يفهم عما أُسّس الثقافة  العربية القديمة , وبشكل ما المعاصرة أيضًا 

نكتشف أن الرؤية "الجاهلية" هي متشابه جدًا من رؤية يمكن أن نجدها في فرنسا والغرب ـ لا أتكلم عن سلبية الأمر أم اجابيته فقط أجد التشاؤم الجاهلي قريبًا من تشاؤم نعرفه في فرنسا وأن في النهاية الشعر الجاهلي قريبًا منا وليس شيئًا قديمًا بعيدًا..

  

...

Ce qu'il se passe en Turquie .... Et pourquoi les manifestations anti-Morsi en Egypte sont très comparables. Et pourquoi l'intervention de l'armée est plus qu'inquiétante.

On what's happening in Turkey ....And why demonstrations against Morsi in Egypt are sor much alike. And why intervention of the army in Egypte is very worrying.

American Dervish - by Ayad Akhtar

     Beautifully written, great narrative, and a very interesting central character (Mina, the narrator's aunt). Character who, rare enough to be noticed, sums up at the end of the book what I always felt like : striving to make one's decision the same that what some call God's will. Freedom of choice being the same than destiny, two things seemingly opposite that always looked to me like two sides of the same coin, one not understandable without the other.

     The story of a young boy trying ot understand the people around him : his nice but desperate father and mother, his aunt he adores but whose life is awful, and all the others guys - stereotyped but greatly rendered here so that they sound very real - you can find in the american-pakistani community.

      But it was nonetheless a bit disapointing in the end : a coming of age book, the sentiments of the narrator sounds truthful, and all the characters are very realistic, but in the "american-muslim" area, it's rather poor. You have the choice between the alcoholic non-believer and the stupid or fanatic believer who interprets religions as he/she likes or sees fit. Only the central character brings some nuance, and her former jewish lover Nathan, but their story are so sad that this interesting middle ground is killed off from the start. So you're left with the lost nice alcoholics and the stupid fanatics. Too bad because the world has so much more nuance to offer than these clichés about believers and non-believers and "muslim men". The narrator mother's is left ranting about "muslim men" and all their faults (machismo, etc) and if all other men were exempt of them ... It leaves the false impression that any other man is better than these "muslim men", and I don't think (I hope) it is what the author wanted to convey. But in the end, you're left with this view that is, needless to say, very untrue (you only need to look at some UN statistics or whatever to be convinced).

       Really too bad for a book that is so good on so many other points. The character-narrator finds freedom only when discarding religion, and even though I recognize the reality of this for many people, what about the other ones, who find freedom and self-empowerment with religion, and in another manner than the terrible and sad destiny of Mina ? What about all the normal people, who have some degree of religion and belief, leading normal lives, with no fanaticism, happily juggling with their differents identities (american/something else for example) ? After reading this book, it seems you can only pick hard-line sides, the intelligent middle ground reduced to dust, like Mina and Nathan. The best you can hope is ending up as a tolerant non believer (which I wouldn't mind if they weren't so rare !). It is very pessimistic, and so, rather disappointing. Great potential at showing nuances throughout but ending up very black and white.

      Not that I want to read fairy tales, but real life is so much less depressing than this, yes the middle ground exists, it can be shaky on the borders, but it's big and shared by so many !